lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKfTPtAUFdmc7PasebNksYztMwRrWsGWPgN6JJJurddu+UP-hQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 23 Oct 2013 17:28:26 +0200
From:	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
To:	Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Mike Galbraith <bitbucket@...ine.de>,
	Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Michael Neuling <mikey@...ling.org>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] sched: Fix nohz_kick_needed to consider the nr_busy
 of the parent domain's group

Hi Preeti

On 23 October 2013 11:50, Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Hi Peter
>
> On 10/23/2013 03:41 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> This nohz stuff really needs to be re-thought and made more scalable --
>> its a royal pain :/
>
> Why  not do something like the below instead? It does the following.
>
> This patch introduces sd_busy just like your suggested patch, except that
> it points to the parent of the highest level sched domain which has the
> SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES set and initializes it in update_top_cache_domain().
> This is the sched domain that is relevant in nohz_kick_needed().
>
> sd_set_sd_state_busy(), sd_set_sd_state_idle() and nohz_kick_needed() query
> and update *only* this sched domain(sd_busy) for nr_busy_cpus. They are the
> only users of this parameter. While we are at it, we might as well change
> the nohz_idle parameter to be updated at the sd_busy domain level alone and
> not the base domain level of a CPU. This will unify the concept of busy cpus
> at just one level of sched domain.
>
> There is no need to iterate through all levels of sched domains of a cpu to
> update nr_busy_cpus since it is irrelevant at all other sched domains except
> at sd_busy level.
>
> De-couple asymmetric load balancing from the nr_busy parameter which the
> PATCH 2/3 anyway does. sd_busy therefore is irrelevant for asymmetric load
> balancing.
>
> Regards
> Preeti U Murthy
> --------------------START_PATCH-------------------------------
>
> sched: Fix nohz_kick_needed()
>
> ---
>  kernel/sched/core.c  |    4 ++++
>  kernel/sched/fair.c  |   40 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
>  kernel/sched/sched.h |    1 +
>  3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index c06b8d3..c1dd11c 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -5271,6 +5271,7 @@ DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct sched_domain *, sd_llc);
>  DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, sd_llc_size);
>  DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, sd_llc_id);
>  DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct sched_domain *, sd_numa);
> +DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct sched_domain *, sd_busy);
>
>  static void update_top_cache_domain(int cpu)
>  {
> @@ -5290,6 +5291,9 @@ static void update_top_cache_domain(int cpu)
>
>         sd = lowest_flag_domain(cpu, SD_NUMA);
>         rcu_assign_pointer(per_cpu(sd_numa, cpu), sd);
> +
> +       sd = highest_flag_domain(cpu, SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES)->parent;

highest_flag_domain can return null pointer

> +       rcu_assign_pointer(per_cpu(sd_busy, cpu), sd);
>  }
>
>  /*
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 813dd61..71e6f14 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -6515,16 +6515,16 @@ static inline void nohz_balance_exit_idle(int cpu)
>  static inline void set_cpu_sd_state_busy(void)
>  {
>         struct sched_domain *sd;
> +       int cpu = smp_processor_id();
>
>         rcu_read_lock();
> -       sd = rcu_dereference_check_sched_domain(this_rq()->sd);
> +       sd = per_cpu(sd_busy, cpu);

Don't you need to use rcu_dereference when using sd_busy ?

>
>         if (!sd || !sd->nohz_idle)
>                 goto unlock;
>         sd->nohz_idle = 0;
>
> -       for (; sd; sd = sd->parent)
> -               atomic_inc(&sd->groups->sgp->nr_busy_cpus);
> +       atomic_inc(&sd->groups->sgp->nr_busy_cpus);
>  unlock:
>         rcu_read_unlock();
>  }
> @@ -6532,16 +6532,16 @@ unlock:
>  void set_cpu_sd_state_idle(void)
>  {
>         struct sched_domain *sd;
> +       int cpu = smp_processor_id();
>
>         rcu_read_lock();
> -       sd = rcu_dereference_check_sched_domain(this_rq()->sd);
> +       sd = per_cpu(sd_busy, cpu);
>
>         if (!sd || sd->nohz_idle)
>                 goto unlock;
>         sd->nohz_idle = 1;
>
> -       for (; sd; sd = sd->parent)
> -               atomic_dec(&sd->groups->sgp->nr_busy_cpus);
> +       atomic_dec(&sd->groups->sgp->nr_busy_cpus);
>  unlock:
>         rcu_read_unlock();
>  }
> @@ -6748,6 +6748,9 @@ static inline int nohz_kick_needed(struct rq *rq, int cpu)
>  {
>         unsigned long now = jiffies;
>         struct sched_domain *sd;
> +       struct sched_group *sg;
> +       struct sched_group_power *sgp;
> +       int nr_busy;
>
>         if (unlikely(idle_cpu(cpu)))
>                 return 0;
> @@ -6773,22 +6776,23 @@ static inline int nohz_kick_needed(struct rq *rq, int cpu)
>                 goto need_kick;
>
>         rcu_read_lock();
> -       for_each_domain(cpu, sd) {
> -               struct sched_group *sg = sd->groups;
> -               struct sched_group_power *sgp = sg->sgp;
> -               int nr_busy = atomic_read(&sgp->nr_busy_cpus);
> +       sd = per_cpu(sd_busy, cpu);
>
> -               if (sd->flags & SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES && nr_busy > 1)
> -                       goto need_kick_unlock;
> +       if (sd) {
> +               sg = sd->groups;

sg is not needed anymore

> +               sgp = sg->sgp;
> +               nr_busy = atomic_read(&sgp->nr_busy_cpus);
>
> -               if (sd->flags & SD_ASYM_PACKING && nr_busy != sg->group_weight
> -                   && (cpumask_first_and(nohz.idle_cpus_mask,
> -                                         sched_domain_span(sd)) < cpu))
> +               if (nr_busy > 1)
>                         goto need_kick_unlock;
> -
> -               if (!(sd->flags & (SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES | SD_ASYM_PACKING)))
> -                       break;
>         }
> +
> +       sd = highest_flag_domain(cpu, SD_ASYM_PACKING);
> +
> +       if (sd && (cpumask_first_and(nohz.idle_cpus_mask,
> +                                 sched_domain_span(sd)) < cpu))
> +               goto need_kick_unlock;
> +
>         rcu_read_unlock();
>         return 0;
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> index ffc7087..0f1253f 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
> +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> @@ -623,6 +623,7 @@ DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct sched_domain *, sd_llc);
>  DECLARE_PER_CPU(int, sd_llc_size);
>  DECLARE_PER_CPU(int, sd_llc_id);
>  DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct sched_domain *, sd_numa);
> +DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct sched_domain *, sd_busy);
>
>  struct sched_group_power {
>         atomic_t ref;
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ