[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKfTPtAUFdmc7PasebNksYztMwRrWsGWPgN6JJJurddu+UP-hQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 17:28:26 +0200
From: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
To: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Mike Galbraith <bitbucket@...ine.de>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Michael Neuling <mikey@...ling.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] sched: Fix nohz_kick_needed to consider the nr_busy
of the parent domain's group
Hi Preeti
On 23 October 2013 11:50, Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Hi Peter
>
> On 10/23/2013 03:41 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> This nohz stuff really needs to be re-thought and made more scalable --
>> its a royal pain :/
>
> Why not do something like the below instead? It does the following.
>
> This patch introduces sd_busy just like your suggested patch, except that
> it points to the parent of the highest level sched domain which has the
> SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES set and initializes it in update_top_cache_domain().
> This is the sched domain that is relevant in nohz_kick_needed().
>
> sd_set_sd_state_busy(), sd_set_sd_state_idle() and nohz_kick_needed() query
> and update *only* this sched domain(sd_busy) for nr_busy_cpus. They are the
> only users of this parameter. While we are at it, we might as well change
> the nohz_idle parameter to be updated at the sd_busy domain level alone and
> not the base domain level of a CPU. This will unify the concept of busy cpus
> at just one level of sched domain.
>
> There is no need to iterate through all levels of sched domains of a cpu to
> update nr_busy_cpus since it is irrelevant at all other sched domains except
> at sd_busy level.
>
> De-couple asymmetric load balancing from the nr_busy parameter which the
> PATCH 2/3 anyway does. sd_busy therefore is irrelevant for asymmetric load
> balancing.
>
> Regards
> Preeti U Murthy
> --------------------START_PATCH-------------------------------
>
> sched: Fix nohz_kick_needed()
>
> ---
> kernel/sched/core.c | 4 ++++
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> kernel/sched/sched.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index c06b8d3..c1dd11c 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -5271,6 +5271,7 @@ DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct sched_domain *, sd_llc);
> DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, sd_llc_size);
> DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, sd_llc_id);
> DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct sched_domain *, sd_numa);
> +DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct sched_domain *, sd_busy);
>
> static void update_top_cache_domain(int cpu)
> {
> @@ -5290,6 +5291,9 @@ static void update_top_cache_domain(int cpu)
>
> sd = lowest_flag_domain(cpu, SD_NUMA);
> rcu_assign_pointer(per_cpu(sd_numa, cpu), sd);
> +
> + sd = highest_flag_domain(cpu, SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES)->parent;
highest_flag_domain can return null pointer
> + rcu_assign_pointer(per_cpu(sd_busy, cpu), sd);
> }
>
> /*
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 813dd61..71e6f14 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -6515,16 +6515,16 @@ static inline void nohz_balance_exit_idle(int cpu)
> static inline void set_cpu_sd_state_busy(void)
> {
> struct sched_domain *sd;
> + int cpu = smp_processor_id();
>
> rcu_read_lock();
> - sd = rcu_dereference_check_sched_domain(this_rq()->sd);
> + sd = per_cpu(sd_busy, cpu);
Don't you need to use rcu_dereference when using sd_busy ?
>
> if (!sd || !sd->nohz_idle)
> goto unlock;
> sd->nohz_idle = 0;
>
> - for (; sd; sd = sd->parent)
> - atomic_inc(&sd->groups->sgp->nr_busy_cpus);
> + atomic_inc(&sd->groups->sgp->nr_busy_cpus);
> unlock:
> rcu_read_unlock();
> }
> @@ -6532,16 +6532,16 @@ unlock:
> void set_cpu_sd_state_idle(void)
> {
> struct sched_domain *sd;
> + int cpu = smp_processor_id();
>
> rcu_read_lock();
> - sd = rcu_dereference_check_sched_domain(this_rq()->sd);
> + sd = per_cpu(sd_busy, cpu);
>
> if (!sd || sd->nohz_idle)
> goto unlock;
> sd->nohz_idle = 1;
>
> - for (; sd; sd = sd->parent)
> - atomic_dec(&sd->groups->sgp->nr_busy_cpus);
> + atomic_dec(&sd->groups->sgp->nr_busy_cpus);
> unlock:
> rcu_read_unlock();
> }
> @@ -6748,6 +6748,9 @@ static inline int nohz_kick_needed(struct rq *rq, int cpu)
> {
> unsigned long now = jiffies;
> struct sched_domain *sd;
> + struct sched_group *sg;
> + struct sched_group_power *sgp;
> + int nr_busy;
>
> if (unlikely(idle_cpu(cpu)))
> return 0;
> @@ -6773,22 +6776,23 @@ static inline int nohz_kick_needed(struct rq *rq, int cpu)
> goto need_kick;
>
> rcu_read_lock();
> - for_each_domain(cpu, sd) {
> - struct sched_group *sg = sd->groups;
> - struct sched_group_power *sgp = sg->sgp;
> - int nr_busy = atomic_read(&sgp->nr_busy_cpus);
> + sd = per_cpu(sd_busy, cpu);
>
> - if (sd->flags & SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES && nr_busy > 1)
> - goto need_kick_unlock;
> + if (sd) {
> + sg = sd->groups;
sg is not needed anymore
> + sgp = sg->sgp;
> + nr_busy = atomic_read(&sgp->nr_busy_cpus);
>
> - if (sd->flags & SD_ASYM_PACKING && nr_busy != sg->group_weight
> - && (cpumask_first_and(nohz.idle_cpus_mask,
> - sched_domain_span(sd)) < cpu))
> + if (nr_busy > 1)
> goto need_kick_unlock;
> -
> - if (!(sd->flags & (SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES | SD_ASYM_PACKING)))
> - break;
> }
> +
> + sd = highest_flag_domain(cpu, SD_ASYM_PACKING);
> +
> + if (sd && (cpumask_first_and(nohz.idle_cpus_mask,
> + sched_domain_span(sd)) < cpu))
> + goto need_kick_unlock;
> +
> rcu_read_unlock();
> return 0;
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> index ffc7087..0f1253f 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
> +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> @@ -623,6 +623,7 @@ DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct sched_domain *, sd_llc);
> DECLARE_PER_CPU(int, sd_llc_size);
> DECLARE_PER_CPU(int, sd_llc_id);
> DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct sched_domain *, sd_numa);
> +DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct sched_domain *, sd_busy);
>
> struct sched_group_power {
> atomic_t ref;
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists