linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv2 1/3] Input: twl4030-pwrbutton

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20131023161752.GA14745@earth.universe>
Date:	Wed, 23 Oct 2013 18:17:53 +0200
From:	Sebastian Reichel <sre@...ian.org>
To:	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc:	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	"grant.likely@...aro.org" <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	"rob.herring@...xeda.com" <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>,
	Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@...aro.org>,
	"linux-input@...r.kernel.org" <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 1/3] Input: twl4030-pwrbutton - add device tree support

Hi,

On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 05:09:36PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 04:01:20PM +0100, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> > Add device tree support for twl4030 power button driver.
> 
> This requires a binding document. As it is it's not possible to review.

Right. I will add it and sent a v3.

> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sre@...ian.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/input/misc/twl4030-pwrbutton.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
> >  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/twl4030-pwrbutton.c b/drivers/input/misc/twl4030-pwrbutton.c
> > index b9a05fd..a3a0fe3 100644
> > --- a/drivers/input/misc/twl4030-pwrbutton.c
> > +++ b/drivers/input/misc/twl4030-pwrbutton.c
> > @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ static irqreturn_t powerbutton_irq(int irq, void *_pwr)
> >  	return IRQ_HANDLED;
> >  }
> >  
> > -static int __init twl4030_pwrbutton_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +static int twl4030_pwrbutton_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  {
> >  	struct input_dev *pwr;
> >  	int irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> > @@ -106,16 +106,24 @@ static int __exit twl4030_pwrbutton_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> >  
> > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF)
> > +static const struct of_device_id twl4030_pwrbutton_dt_match_table[] = {
> > +       { .compatible = "ti,twl4030-pwrbutton" },
> 
> There's no need to shorten this, "ti,twl4030-power-button" would be far easier
> to understand. Unless the datasheet refers to it as pwrbutton?

Yes it's abbreviated in the datasheet.

-- Sebastian

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)