[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131023204838.GB19466@laptop.lan>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 22:48:38 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
jmario@...hat.com,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf, x86: Optimize intel_pmu_pebs_fixup_ip()
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 08:09:53AM +0100, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 10:12 PM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Careful! There is one magic piece of state that you need to
> >> save-and-restore if you do this, namely %cr2. Taking a page fault
> >> always writes to %cr2, and we must *not* corrupt it in the NMI
> >> handler.
> >
> > It looks like this is already dealt with (a similar thing is done for
> > i386).
>
> Oh, ok then, we should be good to go. I wonder why we needed that
> special "_nmi()" version, then..
Ah, the whole fault from nmi trickery from Steve is from after we did
the copy_from_user_nmi() thing. We're only just catching up :-)
> Please do check that NMI increment the irq-counts etc.. Otherwise
> you'll need to add the explicit "pagefault_disable/enable()" pair
> around the __copy_from_user_inatomic()..
Yeah, we add NMI_OFFSET to preempt_count on nmi_enter.
I'll also make sure to test we actually hit the fault path
by concurrently running something like:
while :; echo 1 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches ; done
while doing perf top or so..
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists