[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87k3h461ql.fsf@tw-ebiederman.twitter.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 21:38:10 -0700
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: fengguang.wu@...el.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: -27% netperf TCP_STREAM regression by "tcp_memcontrol: Kill struct tcp_memcontrol"
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> writes:
> From: fengguang.wu@...el.com
> Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 22:41:29 +0100
>
>> We noticed big netperf throughput regressions
>>
>> a4fe34bf902b8f709c63 2e685cad57906e19add7
>> ------------------------ ------------------------
>> 707.40 -40.7% 419.60 lkp-nex04/micro/netperf/120s-200%-TCP_STREAM
>> 2775.60 -23.7% 2116.40 lkp-sb03/micro/netperf/120s-200%-TCP_STREAM
>> 3483.00 -27.2% 2536.00 TOTAL netperf.Throughput_Mbps
>>
>> and bisected it to
>>
>> commit 2e685cad57906e19add7189b5ff49dfb6aaa21d3
>> Author: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
>> Date: Sat Oct 19 16:26:19 2013 -0700
>>
>> tcp_memcontrol: Kill struct tcp_memcontrol
>
> Eric please look into this, I'd rather have a fix to apply than revert your
> work.
Will do I expect some ordering changed, and that changed the cache line
behavior.
If I can't find anything we can revert this one particular patch without
affecting anything else, but it would be nice to keep the data structure
smaller.
Fengguag what would I need to do to reproduce this?
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists