lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFTL4hx=ycrepky0P3DYwoFBgknYumW6+tpW7PygqGD2ZNDFqg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 24 Oct 2013 10:30:39 +0100
From:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To:	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc:	Arnaldo Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf session: Add option to copy events when queueing

2013/9/14 Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>:
> On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 01:37:01PM -0600, David Ahern wrote:
>> When processing events the session code has an ordered samples queue which is
>> used to time-sort events coming in across multiple mmaps. At a later point in
>> time samples on the queue are flushed up to some timestamp at which point the
>> event is actually processed.
>>
>> When analyzing events live (ie., record/analysis path in the same command)
>> there is a race that leads to corrupted events and parse errors which cause
>> perf to terminate. The problem is that when the event is placed in the ordered
>> samples queue it is only a reference to the event which is really sitting in
>> the mmap buffer. Even though the event is queued for later processing the mmap
>> tail pointer is updated which indicates to the kernel that the event has been
>> processed. The race is flushing the event from the queue before it gets
>> overwritten by some other event. For commands trying to process events live
>> (versus just writing to a file) and processing a high rate of events this leads
>> to parse failures and perf terminates.
>>
>> Examples hitting this problem are 'perf kvm stat live', especially with nested
>> VMs which generate 100,000+ traces per second, and a command processing
>> scheduling events with a high rate of context switching -- e.g., running
>> 'perf bench sched pipe'.
>>
>> This patch offers live commands an option to copy the event when it is placed in
>> the ordered samples queue.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
>> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
>> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
>> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
>> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
>> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
>> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
>> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
>> ---
>>  tools/perf/util/session.c |   17 ++++++++++++++---
>>  tools/perf/util/session.h |    1 +
>>  2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/session.c b/tools/perf/util/session.c
>> index 1b185ca..71f16db 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/util/session.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/session.c
>> @@ -483,6 +483,8 @@ static void perf_session_free_sample_buffers(struct perf_session *session)
>>
>>               sq = list_entry(os->to_free.next, struct sample_queue, list);
>>               list_del(&sq->list);
>> +             if (session->copy_on_queue)
>> +                     free(sq->event);
>>               free(sq);
>>       }
>>  }
>> @@ -513,11 +515,15 @@ static int flush_sample_queue(struct perf_session *s,
>>                       break;
>>
>>               ret = perf_evlist__parse_sample(s->evlist, iter->event, &sample);
>> -             if (ret)
>> +             if (ret) {
>>                       pr_err("Can't parse sample, err = %d\n", ret);
>> -             else {
>> +                     if (s->copy_on_queue)
>> +                             free(iter->event);
>> +             } else {
>>                       ret = perf_session_deliver_event(s, iter->event, &sample, tool,
>>                                                        iter->file_offset);
>> +                     if (s->copy_on_queue)
>> +                             free(iter->event);
>>                       if (ret)
>>                               return ret;
>>               }
>> @@ -676,7 +682,12 @@ int perf_session_queue_event(struct perf_session *s, union perf_event *event,
>>
>>       new->timestamp = timestamp;
>>       new->file_offset = file_offset;
>> -     new->event = event;
>> +
>> +     if (s->copy_on_queue) {
>> +             new->event = malloc(event->header.size);
>> +             memcpy(new->event, event, event->header.size);
>> +     } else
>> +             new->event = event;
>>
>>       __queue_event(new, s);
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/session.h b/tools/perf/util/session.h
>> index 3aa75fb..4adfcbb 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/util/session.h
>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/session.h
>> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ struct perf_session {
>>       bool                    fd_pipe;
>>       bool                    repipe;
>>       struct ordered_samples  ordered_samples;
>> +     bool                    copy_on_queue;
>
> So do you think it should stay optional? This looks like a global problem, I mean
> the event can be unmapped anytime for any builtin tool mapping it, right?
>
> Also we already allocate the sample list node (struct sample_queue) from os->sample
> buffer. ie: we have our own allocator there.
>
> Probably we should reuse that and include the copied event space in "struct sample_queue"?
>
> Also looking at it now, it seems we have a bug on the existing code:
>
>
>         if (!list_empty(sc)) {
>                 new = list_entry(sc->next, struct sample_queue, list);
>                 list_del(&new->list);
>         } else if (os->sample_buffer) {
>                 new = os->sample_buffer + os->sample_buffer_idx;
>                 if (++os->sample_buffer_idx == MAX_SAMPLE_BUFFER)
>                         os->sample_buffer = NULL;
>         } else {
>                os->sample_buffer = malloc(MAX_SAMPLE_BUFFER * sizeof(*new));
>                if (!os->sample_buffer)
>                         return -ENOMEM;
>                list_add(&os->sample_buffer->list, &os->to_free);
>                os->sample_buffer_idx = 2;
>                new = os->sample_buffer + 1;
>         }
>
> If we actually run out of buffer rooms, we should realloc right after and not
> wait for the next entry, otherwise we loose an event:

Bah, checking that again, there don't seem to be a bug there. Actually
the sample buffer is reset after we pick the last entry. So it looks
all fine. I got confused as usual. Nevermind.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ