[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131024114133.GA26610@dhcp-26-207.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 13:41:33 +0200
From: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...hat.com>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Michael Ellerman <michael@...erman.id.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>,
Mark Lord <kernel@...rt.ca>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 12/29] PCI/MSI: Introduce pcim_enable_msi*()
family helpers
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 11:57:40AM +0100, David Laight wrote:
> The one case it doesn't work is where the driver either
> wants the full number or the minimum number - but not
> a value in between.
>
> Might be worth adding an extra parameter so that this
> (and maybe other) odd requirements can be met.
IMHO its not worth it, since it is not possible to generalize
all odd requirements out there. I do not think we should blow
the API in this case.
Having said that, the min-or-max interface is probably the only
worth considering. But again, I would prefer to put its semantics
to function name rather than to extra parameters, i.e.
pcim_enable_msix_min_max(struct pci_dev *dev, struct msix_entry *entries,
unsigned int minvec, unsigned int maxvec);
> Some static inline functions could be used for the common cases.
>
> David
--
Regards,
Alexander Gordeev
agordeev@...hat.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists