linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86, kdump: crashkernel=X try to reserve below 896M first, then try below 4G, then MAXMEM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20131024192752.GG2322@redhat.com>
Date:	Thu, 24 Oct 2013 15:27:52 -0400
From:	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
To:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc:	WANG Chao <chaowang@...hat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
	Jacob Shin <jacob.shin@....com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	"kexec@...ts.infradead.org" <kexec@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, kdump: crashkernel=X try to reserve below 896M
 first, then try below 4G, then MAXMEM

On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 12:24:57PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 12:15:25PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> >
> > Also keeping things simple by not trying to *impose* a new crashkernel=
> > syntax on existing crashkernel=xM users.
> 
> Existing user that have crashkernel=xM working with their old kernel
> and old kexec-tools, they still could keep their old command line and
> old kexec-tools
> with new updated kernel.
> We should not change semantics to surprise them.

Old users will get reservation still below 896MB.

It will go above 896MB only if memory could not be allocated below 896MB.

In the past reservation will fail and kexec-tools will fail.
Now reservation will succeed but kexec-tools will fail.

So end result a user sees is that kexec-tools fails. So I don't see how
we are breaking existing installations or user setups.

Thanks
Vivek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/