[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5268CEDE.2080807@asianux.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 15:40:14 +0800
From: Chen Gang <gang.chen@...anux.com>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
CC: Joern Rennecke <joern.rennecke@...ecosm.com>,
James Hogan <james.hogan@...tec.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>,
"jeremy.bennett@...ecosm.com" <jeremy.bennett@...ecosm.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Claudiu Zissulescu <Claudiu.Zissulescu@...opsys.com>,
Francois Bedard <Francois.Bedard@...opsys.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel/modsign_certificate.S: use real contents instead
of macro GLOBAL()
On 10/24/2013 02:44 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am 24.10.2013 08:26, schrieb Chen Gang:
>> On 10/24/2013 02:03 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> Anyway, maybe it is also the tool chain's bug (so I include related arc
>> tool chain guys in this mail).
>
> That's exactly my point. Before you blindly patch the kernel just to make it
> somehow build you need to find the root cause.
> Do you even have an ARC board to test the kernel?
>
Hmm... I don't think it is blindly, at least, we can not say: "if tool
chain has issues, we should not use it, if we have no related hard
wares, it is useless to compile them".
We are focus on the contribution, not on whether others have issues or
'qualifications', if we are sure this patch should be useful, we need go
ahead.
For normal members, it is not quite important, but for managerial
members or a company, of cause, they will/should understand these rules.
> Thanks,
> //richard
>
>
>
Thanks.
--
Chen Gang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists