[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131025145625.GB1196@krava.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 16:56:25 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...e.hu,
ak@...ux.intel.com, acme@...hat.com, zheng.z.yan@...el.com,
bp@...en8.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] perf: add active_entry list head to struct
perf_event
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 02:58:02PM +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> This patch adds a new fields to the struct perf_event.
> It is intended to be used to chain events which are
> active (enabled). It helps in the hardware layer
> for PMU which do not have actual counter restrictions, i.e.,
> free running read-only counters. Active events are chained
> as opposed to being tracked via the counter they use.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
> ---
> include/linux/perf_event.h | 1 +
> kernel/events/core.c | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
> index 2e069d1..a376384 100644
> --- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
> +++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
> @@ -435,6 +435,7 @@ struct perf_event {
> struct perf_cgroup *cgrp; /* cgroup event is attach to */
> int cgrp_defer_enabled;
> #endif
> + struct list_head active_entry;
Could this be in union with 'hlist_entry' ? It looks
as 'same purpose' and 'mutualy exclusive stuff.
jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists