[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <526A88DE.2040502@zytor.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 16:06:06 +0100
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>
CC: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>, Tao Ma <boyu.mt@...bao.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation/ABI: Document the non-ABI status of Kconfig
and symbols
On 10/24/2013 09:57 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>
> And what about the kernel make "interface", is it considered also as non-ABI?
>
> E.g.
> Before ffee0de (x86: Default to ARCH=x86 to avoid overriding CONFIG_64BIT)
> "make defconfig ARCH=x86" produced a i386 defconfig. Now it produces a
> x86_64 defconfig.
> I'm sure some build scripted failed badly.
>
>
Definitely not ABI, although obviously not a completely "break blindly"
either.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists