[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFy7TpvkVuPEOJ7Qqirwap1gXoD1_MrYLhgPAYuVpN8u=w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 09:38:32 +0100
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Knut Petersen <Knut_Petersen@...nline.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG 3.12.rc4] Oops: unable to handle kernel paging request
during shutdown
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> And your other oopses do seem to have a similar pattern, even if their
> actual oops is elsewhere. They oops in run_timer_softirq, also taking
> a page fault in the 0xf9...... range, so it might well be a vmalloc
> address there too.
Hmm.. I just got a run_timer_softirq oops on my own laptop, slightly
different. That was not during shutdown, although there was a "yum
upgrade" finishing when that happened, so it's quite likely that there
was a service shutdown (and then restart).
I think it's related. But my oops has almost no information: the IP
that was jumped to was bogus, and the callchain is just CPU idle
followed by the softirq -> run_timers_softirq handling, so there's no
real way to see *what* triggered it.
The bad rip was ffffffffa051e250, which is not a valid code address.
It *might* be a module address, though. So this might be triggered by
rmmod on some module that doesn't remove all its timers...
Ideas?
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists