linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] INTEL DRM DRIVERS : No LVDS hardware on Intel D410PT and D425KT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <526D5B8C.7090904@flitspace.org.uk>
Date:	Sun, 27 Oct 2013 18:29:32 +0000
From:	Rob Pearce <rob@...tspace.org.uk>
To:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC:	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
	David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
	intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] INTEL DRM DRIVERS : No LVDS hardware on Intel D410PT
 and D425KT

On 27/10/13 17:33, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 04:13:42PM +0000, Rob Pearce wrote:
>> From: Rob Pearce <rob@...tspace.org.uk>
>>
>> The Intel D410PT(LW) and D425KT Mini-ITX desktop boards both show up as
>> having LVDS but the hardware is not populated. This patch adds them to
>> the list of such systems. Patch is against 3.11.4
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rob Pearce <rob@...tspace.org.uk>
>> ---
>> Patch revised to match the D425KT exactly as the D425KTW does have LVDS. 
>> According to Intel's documentation, the D410PTL and D410PLTW don't.
> 
> Any reason you don't want this in the stable tree as well?
> 

No, should be in stable. Sorry, I'm obviously getting some etiquette
wrong (this is the first patch I've submitted).

Cheers,
Rob

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/