[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131027192911.GK18189@phenom.ffwll.local>
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 20:29:11 +0100
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Rob Pearce <rob@...tspace.org.uk>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] INTEL DRM DRIVERS : No LVDS hardware on Intel D410PT and
D425KT
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 11:35:58AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 10/27/2013 10:33 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> >On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 04:13:42PM +0000, Rob Pearce wrote:
> >>From: Rob Pearce <rob@...tspace.org.uk>
> >>
> >>The Intel D410PT(LW) and D425KT Mini-ITX desktop boards both show up as
> >>having LVDS but the hardware is not populated. This patch adds them to
> >>the list of such systems. Patch is against 3.11.4
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Rob Pearce <rob@...tspace.org.uk>
> >>---
> >>Patch revised to match the D425KT exactly as the D425KTW does have LVDS.
> >>According to Intel's documentation, the D410PTL and D410PLTW don't.
> >
> >Any reason you don't want this in the stable tree as well?
> >
>
> Hi Greg,
>
> pardon my ignorance, but I thought this was supposed to be the maintainer's call to make ?
> Did I get this wrong ?
Maintainer occasionally fumble it, so it's better when the patch submitter
also thinks about this. I can always change it when I disagree ;-)
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists