linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv2 1/3] Input: twl4030-keypad

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20131027114753.GB14901@amd.pavel.ucw.cz>
Date:	Sun, 27 Oct 2013 12:47:53 +0100
From:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:	linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
	'Beno?t Cousson' <bcousson@...libre.com>,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-omap@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 1/3] Input: twl4030-keypad - add device tree support

Hi!

> > > + * keypad,num-rows and keypad,num-columns are required.
> > Is "keypad," prefix neccessary here?
> 
> See Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/matrix-keymap.txt
> 
> > > +Optional Properties specific to linux:
> > > +- linux,keypad-no-autorepeat: do no enable autorepeat feature.
> > 
> > "do not autorepeat". Plus I do not see what is Linux specifc about not
> > autorepeating... Other systems will likely know about autorepeat, too.
> 
> This property has already been used like this for
> samsung-keypad, stmpe-keypad, omap-keypad and
> gpio-matrix-keypad.

Ok. But you still have a typo. "do no enable" => "do not enable".

> > > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF)
> > I'm probably missing something here, but why not #ifdef CONFIG_OF?
> 
> I have been told for other drivers, that IS_ENABLED() is
> the prefered way to check for configuration these days.

CONFIG_OF can not be module, using IS_ENABLED() on it is just wrong.

> > > @@ -381,7 +426,7 @@ static int twl4030_kp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > >  
> > >  	input_set_capability(input, EV_MSC, MSC_SCAN);
> > >  	/* Enable auto repeat feature of Linux input subsystem */
> > > -	if (pdata->rep)
> > > +	if (!kp->no_autorepeat)
> > >  		__set_bit(EV_REP, input->evbit);
> > >
> > 
> > Double negation is nasty to read. I believe code would be more
> > readable if you switched logic to kp->autorepeat.
> 
> I was thinking about the same when writing it, but decided
> against it, since it will just move the double negation to
> the variable initialization.

Well, the property should be linux,keypad-autorepeat in the first
place, but it is too late to change that.

Thanks,
								Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/