[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20131027050429.7fcc2ed5.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 05:04:29 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
handai.szj@...bao.com, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] percpu counter: cast this_cpu_sub() adjustment
On Sun, 27 Oct 2013 07:22:55 -0400 Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
> We probably want to cc stable for this and the next one. How should
> these be routed? I can take these through percpu tree or mm works
> too. Either way, it'd be best to route them together.
Yes, all three look like -stable material to me. I'll grab them later
in the week if you haven't ;)
The names of the first two patches distress me. They rather clearly
assert that the code affects percpu_counter.[ch], but that is not the case.
Massaging is needed to fix that up.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists