[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131028084440.GA4314@pd.tnic>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 09:44:41 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>
Cc: Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, mjg59@...f.ucam.org, hpa@...or.com,
James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com, vgoyal@...hat.com,
ebiederm@...ssion.com, horms@...ge.net.au,
kexec@...ts.fedoraproject.org, kexec@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [patch 2/6] x86 efi: reserve boot service fix
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 09:18:24AM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> There should be some people see below message with non-kexec kernel:
> "Could not reserve boot range ..."
I can find one other report like that: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/16/309
[ 0.000000] efi: Could not reserve boot range [0x0000000000-0x0000000fff]
for
efi: mem00: type=3, attr=0xf, range=[0x0000000000000000-0x0000000000001000) (0MB)
which is EFI_BOOT_SERVICES_CODE and
efi: Could not reserve boot range [0x000005f000-0x000009ffff]
for
efi: mem06: type=3, attr=0xf, range=[0x000000000005f000-0x00000000000a0000) (0MB)
which is of the same type.
> But it's hard for them to notice the bad functionality because
> it's only one mem range which might be not the boot range what
> SetVirtualAddressMap need
Right.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists