[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <877gcx92yd.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 18:09:30 +0900
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Rodrigo Campos <rodrigo@...g.com.ar>
Cc: namhyung.kim@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
acme@...stprotocols.net, asharma@...com, fweisbec@...il.com
Subject: Re: State of "perf: Add a new sort order: SORT_INCLUSIVE"
On Mon, 28 Oct 2013 08:42:44 +0000, Rodrigo Campos wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 02:09:49PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>> Anyway, You can find the series and discussion on the link below:
>>
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/13/81
>
> I've read the cover letter for that series and probably because I don't know
> about perf internals I have a question: How will "--culumate" interact with
> "--sort=dso" for example ?
>
> I mean, is it possible for that to show more than 100% ? (if you add all the
> 93.35% in your example in the cover letter, or something similar). Or
> "--culumate --sort=dso" will just group together all entries that have a dso in
> the call chain ?
Hmm.. I think --cumulate option is only meaningful when sort order
includes symbol. Maybe I can add support for --sort=dso case as well
but not sure it's worth. Do you think it's really needed?
>
> Sorry if the question was too obvious if I knew about perf internals :S
No need to sorry about it. :)
Thanks,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists