| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 18:09:30 +0900 From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org> To: Rodrigo Campos <rodrigo@...g.com.ar> Cc: namhyung.kim@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, acme@...stprotocols.net, asharma@...com, fweisbec@...il.com Subject: Re: State of "perf: Add a new sort order: SORT_INCLUSIVE" On Mon, 28 Oct 2013 08:42:44 +0000, Rodrigo Campos wrote: > On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 02:09:49PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: >> Anyway, You can find the series and discussion on the link below: >> >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/13/81 > > I've read the cover letter for that series and probably because I don't know > about perf internals I have a question: How will "--culumate" interact with > "--sort=dso" for example ? > > I mean, is it possible for that to show more than 100% ? (if you add all the > 93.35% in your example in the cover letter, or something similar). Or > "--culumate --sort=dso" will just group together all entries that have a dso in > the call chain ? Hmm.. I think --cumulate option is only meaningful when sort order includes symbol. Maybe I can add support for --sort=dso case as well but not sure it's worth. Do you think it's really needed? > > Sorry if the question was too obvious if I knew about perf internals :S No need to sorry about it. :) Thanks, Namhyung -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists