lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 15:52:15 +0000 From: Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org> To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] EFI changes On Mon, 28 Oct, at 02:44:13PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > and this breaks the ARM build: > > In file included from /home/mingo/tip/init/main.c:44: > /home/mingo/tip/include/linux/efi.h:842:21: error: asm/efi.h: No such file or directory > /home/mingo/tip/init/main.c: In function 'start_kernel': > /home/mingo/tip/init/main.c:638: error: implicit declaration of function 'efi_enabled' > /home/mingo/tip/init/main.c:639: error: implicit declaration of function 'efi_late_init' > /home/mingo/tip/init/main.c:640: error: implicit declaration of function 'efi_free_boot_services' Ah, that's my own fault because my 'next' branch doesn't include the ARM EFI support. Where did you get the patches from? Are they in linux-next? I'm inclined to drop the cleanup patch for now and do it later, once things have settled because it's also causing conflicts for Borislav's work. -- Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists