[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131028160053.GO4314@pd.tnic>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 17:00:53 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>
Cc: X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
fwts-devel@...ts.ubuntu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/12] EFI: Runtime services virtual mapping
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 11:22:46AM +0000, Matt Fleming wrote:
> Could you use the efi_enabled() function to test for EFI_OLD_MEMMAP
> instead of test_bit()?
Sure.
> This way we won't exhaust the bitspace quite so soon (since ARM/ARM64
Yeah, very foresightful.
> can reuse EFI_ARCH_1 if they need it), plus this memory mapping method
> is a very architecture-specific thing and so makes sense to hide it in
> the bowels of arch/x86. If it turns out that ARM/ARM64 need the exact
> same config option we can delete EFI_ARCH_1 and move EFI_OLD_MEMMAP to
> include/linux/efi.h just like in your original patch.
>
> What do you think?
Yep, done and pushed out.
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists