[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131028162438.GB14350@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 17:24:38 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sebastien.dugue@...l.net,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Run checksumming in parallel accross multiple alu's
* Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com> wrote:
> Looking at the specific cpu counters we get this:
>
> Base:
> Total time: 0.179 [sec]
>
> Performance counter stats for 'perf bench sched messaging -- bash -c echo 1 > /sys/module/csum_test/parameters/test_fire' (20 runs):
>
> 1571.304618 task-clock # 5.213 CPUs utilized ( +- 0.45% )
> 14,423 context-switches # 0.009 M/sec ( +- 4.28% )
> 2,710 cpu-migrations # 0.002 M/sec ( +- 2.83% )
Hm, for these second round of measurements were you using 'perf stat
-a -C ...'?
The most accurate method of measurement for such single-threaded
workloads is something like:
taskset 0x1 perf stat -a -C 1 --repeat 20 ...
this will bind your workload to CPU#0, and will do PMU measurements
only there - without mixing in other CPUs or workloads.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists