[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGVrzcYj91m=rC5ye9eAo=eMN0mBzk9-Bv8K6myTpnH28PLUxQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 09:45:23 -0700
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Konstantin Tokarev <annulen@...dex.ru>
Cc: Yann Collet <yann.collet.73@...il.com>,
"linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
Brent Taylor <motobud@...il.com>,
Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: lz4hc compression in UBIFS?
2013/10/28 Konstantin Tokarev <annulen@...dex.ru>:
>
>
> 24.10.2013, 19:15, "Konstantin Tokarev" <annulen@...dex.ru>:
>> Attached patch to crypto API wrapper for lz4hc seems to fix the issue. I can save
>> and read files on LZ4HC-compressed volume, and I'm running on LZ4HC-compressed rootfs,
>> flashed from mkfs.ubifs generated image (patch by Elie De Brauwer). My software
>> works correctly.
>>
>> Unfortunately, on my board LZ4HC-compressed UBIFS volume performs noticeable worse
>> than LZO, while still faster than zlib. I guess the reason is that CPU is no longer a
>> bottleneck for my system, but NAND speed.
>>
>> Thank you all for your help!
>
> Can anyone review the correctness of my patch? Looks like API of LZ4 decompressor is
> used wrong way in crypto API.
Can you make a formal submission of it? That would probably help reviewing it.
--
Florian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists