[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131028173152.GB1040@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 23:01:52 +0530
From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@....fi>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
Hemant Kumar <hkshaw@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
hegdevasant@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
anton@...hat.com, systemtap@...rceware.org,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, aravinda@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] Support for perf to probe into SDT markers:
> >
> >But what if a system has both 32 bit libc and 64 bit libc?
> >Wont we could end up with 2 libc:setjmp?
> >Should we give some more intelligence into perf to choose the 64 bit
> >libc over 32 bit one?
>
> You can just trace both of them by default, no?
>
There has to be a one to one association with the event name and its
mapping. Every event name will finally map to a unique inode and an
offset.
One option would be for perf to look at these markers and have a
different event name for similar markers in different executables.
--
Thanks and Regards
Srikar Dronamraju
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists