linux-kernel - Re: [BUG 3.12.rc4] Oops: unable to handle kernel paging request during shutdown

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20131028173056.GF11209@redhat.com>
Date:	Mon, 28 Oct 2013 18:30:56 +0100
From:	Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...hat.com>
To:	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
	Knut Petersen <Knut_Petersen@...nline.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG 3.12.rc4] Oops: unable to handle kernel paging request
 during shutdown

On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 11:23:41AM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>[+cc Veaceslav]
>
>On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
><gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 09:13:29PM +0000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>>> .. and one more case of freeing a delayed work object (likely a kobject again):
>>>
>>> This time it looks like it's in the PCI layer, freeing the msi irq information.
>>>
>>> It looks like that code simply does
>>>
>>>     kobject_del(&entry->kobj);
>>>     kobject_put(&entry->kobj);
>>>     list_del(&entry->list);
>>>     kfree(entry);
>>>
>>> and the problem is that the "entry->kobj" may have *other* references
>>> to it, thanks to people accessing it through /sys, so despite doing a
>>> kojbect_del/kobject_put(), it's not at all ok to then do a "kfree()"
>>> on it. The embedded kobj might still be in use.
>>>
>>> Afaik, that code should do the kfree() on the kobject in the _release_
>>> method, not synchronously like that.
>>>
>>> We already have a msi_kobj_release(), I'm wondering why that doesn't
>>> do the kfree().
>>>
>>> Bjorn? Yinghai? Greg, comments about that msi kobj usage?
>>
>> Ick, it really should be doing a kfree() in the release only.  Bjorn has
>> had a bunch of changes in this area recently, perhaps they are in
>> linux-next waiting for 3.13, and I've talked to him about getting rid of
>> all of the kobjects for msi files, as I don't think it's needed at all.
>
>IIRC, you said you might take a look at converting this to attributes
>on the train back home, so I haven't looked into it myself :)
>
>> Bjorn, don't you have a fix for this problem already done somewhere?
>
>Yep, this is clearly wrong, and Veaceslav has a patch that moves the
>kfree() to the release function.  I've been waiting for a consolidated
>repost of all his MSI-related fixes, but maybe he's been waiting for
>*me*.

https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/10/9/170

My patchset is ready to be applied, in its v2 state.

Except that the bits with kobject_del() (theoretical race) - which are done
in your patch "kobject: remove kset from sysfs immediately in
kset_unregister()", though I didn't see it accepted.

Should I re-send the patchset?

>
>Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/