[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131028054739.GA20741@dhcp-16-126.nay.redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 13:47:39 +0800
From: Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>, WANG Chao <chaowang@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
Jacob Shin <jacob.shin@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
"kexec@...ts.infradead.org" <kexec@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, kdump: crashkernel=X try to reserve below 896M
first, then try below 4G, then MAXMEM
> Again, for distribution, when new kernel is added, new kernel will all
> have ",high"
> and new kexec-tools get installed.
>
> Even we want to extend crashkernel=XM, then i would like to have
> it identical to crashkernel=XM,high instead.
My points: I can accept the approach of extending crashkernel=XM to
use high mem firstly if we could remove the extra 72M in low mem, but
apparently it's not doable now. So I would vote for Chao's patch.
Also newer kernel use more complex ",high" then older kernel looks not good.
Thanks
Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists