[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131028203052.GO1982@console-pimps.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 20:30:52 +0000
From: Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] EFI changes
On Mon, 28 Oct, at 04:55:25PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 28 Oct, at 02:44:13PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > and this breaks the ARM build:
> > >
> > > In file included from /home/mingo/tip/init/main.c:44:
> > > /home/mingo/tip/include/linux/efi.h:842:21: error: asm/efi.h: No such file or directory
> > > /home/mingo/tip/init/main.c: In function 'start_kernel':
> > > /home/mingo/tip/init/main.c:638: error: implicit declaration of function 'efi_enabled'
> > > /home/mingo/tip/init/main.c:639: error: implicit declaration of function 'efi_late_init'
> > > /home/mingo/tip/init/main.c:640: error: implicit declaration of function 'efi_free_boot_services'
> >
> > Ah, that's my own fault because my 'next' branch doesn't include
> > the ARM EFI support. Where did you get the patches from? Are they
> > in linux-next?
>
> It's all in tip:x86/efi.
>
> > I'm inclined to drop the cleanup patch for now and do it later,
> > once things have settled because it's also causing conflicts for
> > Borislav's work.
>
> Sure.
OK, I've pushed out the 'next' branch and retagged it as 'efi-next'
(again), which hopefully should be finally free from build errors.
--
Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists