linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ACPI: remove unused ACPI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <526E0293.4080702@free-electrons.com>
Date:	Mon, 28 Oct 2013 07:22:11 +0100
From:	Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenacker@...e-electrons.com>
To:	Lan Tianyu <lantianyu1986@...il.com>
CC:	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, rjw@...ysocki.net,
	"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r kernel org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: remove unused ACPI_PROCFS Kconfig param

Hi Lan,

Thank you very much for this review!

On 10/28/2013 07:13 AM, Lan Tianyu wrote:
> 2013/10/27 Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenacker@...e-electrons.com>:
>> This patch removes the ACPI_PROCFS parameter
>> (support for legacy /proc/acpi), which is defined
>> but no longer used anywhere in the makefiles and source code.
>>
> I think this should be not removed now. Since there are still interfaces
> under /proc/acpi (E.G, /proc/acpi/wakeup and /proc/acpi/lid/*).
>
> The origin commit which introduces the kconfig is to make some
> interfaces that have backup interfaces in the sysfs configurable before
> removing them actually.
>
> So we still need this kconfig when try to remove remaining /proc/acpi
> interfaces.

I agree that keeping this legacy interface would still be useful.
However, CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS is no longer used anywhere, neither in
Makefiles nor in the source code. ACPI_PROCFS isn't event used in
Kconfig files as an intermediate dependency.

What I deduce from that is that even if you set CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS=y in
the kernel configuration, this will have no impact at all.

That's why I proposed to  remove this Kconfig parameter.

Another option would be to fix the issue, and get CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS to
be properly taken into account again.

Cheers,

Michael.

-- 
Michael Opdenacker, CEO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
+33 484 258 098

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/