[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <754E4595-A2C5-4BAD-BBA7-29091A83197B@codeaurora.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 03:09:52 -0500
From: Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>
To: Xiubo Li-B47053 <B47053@...escale.com>
Cc: Guo Shawn-R65073 <r65073@...escale.com>,
"thierry.reding@...il.com" <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
"grant.likely@...aro.org" <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
"ian.campbell@...rix.com" <ian.campbell@...rix.com>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"pawel.moll@....com" <pawel.moll@....com>,
"rob.herring@...xeda.com" <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
"matt.porter@...aro.org" <matt.porter@...aro.org>,
"s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
"swarren@...dotorg.org" <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
"t.figa@...sung.com" <t.figa@...sung.com>,
"linux@....linux.org.uk" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
"rob@...dley.net" <rob@...dley.net>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCHv5 4/4] Documentation: Add device tree bindings for Freescale FTM PWM.
On Oct 28, 2013, at 10:48 PM, Xiubo Li-B47053 wrote:
>>> This adds the Document for Freescale FTM PWM driver under
>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Xiubo Li <Li.Xiubo@...escale.com>
>>> ---
>>> .../devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-fsl-ftm.txt | 34
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)
>>> create mode 100644
>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-fsl-ftm.txt
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-fsl-ftm.txt
>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-fsl-ftm.txt
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 0000000..175b762
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-fsl-ftm.txt
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
>>> +Freescale FTM PWM controller
>>
>> What does FTM stand for, and can we spell out PWM at least once early on.
>>
>
> "FTM" is for short of "FlexTimer Module", I'll use the full name then.
>
>>> +
>>> +Required properties:
>>> +- compatible: Should be "fsl,vf610-ftm-pwm"
>>> +- reg: Physical base address and length of the controller's registers
>>> +- #pwm-cells: Should be 3. See pwm.txt in this directory for a
>>> +description of
>>> + the cells format.
>>> +- clock-names : Includes the following module clock source entries:
>>> + "ftm0" (system clock),
>>> + "ftm0_fix_sel" (fixed frequency clock),
>>> + "ftm0_ext_sel" (external clock)
>>> +- clocks : Must contain a clock specifier for each entry in
>>> +clock-names,
>>> + See ../clock/clock-bindings.txt for details of the property values.
>>> +- fsl,pwm-counter-clk: The FTM PWM counter clock source, should be
>>> +one of the
>>> + entries in clock-names.
>>
>> Why do we need this, why not just have only the clock-names/clocks
>> reference the clk that is actually used?
>>
>
> As I have replied before, the FTM has two clock sources: the module clock and the counter clock.
>
> The counter clock source is selectable depends on different board and also the hardware design:
> +++++
> * FTM source clock is selectable
> * Source clock can be the system clock, the fixed frequency clock, or an external
> clock
> * Fixed frequency clock is an additional clock input to allow the selection of an on
> chip clock source other than the system clock
> * Selecting external clock connects FTM clock to a chip level input pin therefore
> allowing to synchronize the FTM counter with an off chip clock source
> -----
> From the above description we can see that the external clock source can allow to synchronize the
> FTM counter with an off chip clock source.
>
> As the chip spec permits the counter clock source be selectable, so the different board maybe has different
> implementation, if the driver do not support, this will be a bug.
The binding specs the HW so what a driver does or doesn't support isn't relevant. Since I assume only one of these clocks makes sense for a given system I don't see a reason the binding should not just state that a given dts will have the one the system specified rather than all 3.
>>> +- pinctrl-names: must contain a "default" entry.
>>> +- pinctrl-NNN: One property must exist for each entry in pinctrl-names.
>>> + See ../pinctrl/pinctrl-bindings.txt for details of the property
>> values.
>>
>> let's drop the .. when making directory references.
>>
>
> Is absolute path " Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-bindings.txt " or just "pinctrl/pinctrl-bindings.txt " ?
The later.
- k
--
Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists