linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] perf fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20131029100626.GA25557@gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 29 Oct 2013 11:06:26 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
	Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] perf fixes


* Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
> <acme@...stprotocols.net> wrote:
> > Em Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 09:34:11AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> >> And then, when reverting it, Stephane forgot to match the number number
> >> of expected entries to be matched/assigned from 8 to 5, can you try with
> >> the following patch instead?
> >
> > Does the wording on this commit log sounds about right to you?
> >
> Thanks for fixing this issue.

Thanks guys for testing it - I just sent the pending fixes to Linus 
so it should soon be resolved upstream as well.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/