[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <526F0A71.4000504@asianux.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 09:08:01 +0800
From: Chen Gang <gang.chen@...anux.com>
To: Vineet Gupta <vineetg76@...il.com>
CC: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, noamc@...hip.com,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arc: kernel: remove '__init' for first_lines_of_secondary()
On 10/28/2013 09:53 PM, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> On 10/23/2013 07:46 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
>> first_lines_of_secondary() is a '__init' function, but it may be called
>> by __cpu_up() by _cpu_up() by cpu_up() which is a normal export symbol
>> function. So recommend to remove '__init'.
>>
>> The related warning (with allmodconfig):
>>
>> MODPOST vmlinux.o
>> WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x315c): Section mismatch in reference from the function __cpu_up() to the function .init.text:first_lines_of_secondary()
>> The function __cpu_up() references
>> the function __init first_lines_of_secondary().
>> This is often because __cpu_up lacks a __init
>> annotation or the annotation of first_lines_of_secondary is wrong.
>>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen@...anux.com>
>
> Applied for 3.13. But I'm planning to squash all the __init section annotation
> fixes into one patch. OK with you ?
>
It is OK to me. They are all related with each other, although toolchain
reports several warnings (originally, I made them based on warning items).
Thanks.
--
Chen Gang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists