[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <1823897.8rOixkM4PW@amdc1227>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 12:42:02 +0100
From: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@...sung.com>
To: Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>
Cc: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>, rjw@...k.pl,
mark.rutland@....com, swarren@...dotorg.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, viresh.kumar@...aro.org,
s.nawrocki@...sung.com, m.szyprowski@...sung.com,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux@....linux.org.uk,
Mateusz Krawczuk <m.krawczuk@...tner.samsung.com>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org,
thomas.abraham@...aro.org, b.zolnierkie@...sung.com,
t.stanislaws@...sung.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
pawel.moll@....com, ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk,
rob.herring@...xeda.com, ben-linux@...ff.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kyungmin.park@...sung.com, rob@...dley.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] ARM: S5PV210: move to common clk framework
Hi Kukjin, Mike,
On Monday 21 of October 2013 05:16:05 Mike Turquette wrote:
> Quoting Kukjin Kim (2013-10-20 13:51:42)
> > On 10/20/13 01:03, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > > Hi Mike, Kukjin, Rafael,
> > >
> > > On Tuesday 24 of September 2013 14:50:06 Mateusz Krawczuk wrote:
> > >> This patch series is the new s5pv210 clock implementation
> > >> (using common clk framework).
> > >>
> > >> This implementation is compatible with device tree definition and board
> > >> files.
> > >>
> > >> This patch series is based on linux-next and has been tested on goni and
> > >> aquila
> > >> boards using board file.
> > >>
> > >> Since v4:
> > >> Corrected mux flags for finpll.
> > >>
> > >> Since v3:
> > >>
> > >> Replace s5pv210_clk_register_finpll, by creating mux finpll
> > >> with xusbxti and xxti as parrents.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Mateusz Krawczuk (3):
> > >> clk: samsung: Add clock driver for s5pc110/s5pv210
> > >> Cpufreq: s5pv210 cpufreq fixes for CCF
> > >> ARM: s5pv210: Migrate clock handling to Common Clock Framework
> > >>
> > >> .../bindings/clock/samsung,s5pv210-clock.txt | 75 +++
> > >> arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/Kconfig | 9 +
> > >> arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/Makefile | 4 +-
> > >> arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/common.c | 17 +
> > >> arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/common.h | 10 +
> > >> arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/mach-goni.c | 2 +-
> > >> arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/mach-smdkv210.c | 2 +-
> > >> arch/arm/plat-samsung/Kconfig | 2 +-
> > >> drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile | 3 +
> > >> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-s5pv210.c | 673
> > >> +++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c
> > >> | 6 +-
> > >> include/dt-bindings/clock/samsung,s5pv210-clock.h | 224 +++++++
> > >> 12 files changed, 1019 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > >> create mode 100644
> > >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/samsung,s5pv210-clock.txt
> > >> create mode 100644 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-s5pv210.c
> > >> create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/clock/samsung,s5pv210-clock.h
> > >
> > > I believe this series is reasonable to be applied. Could we agree on
> > > the tree it would go through and get all tne required acks?
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Tomasz
> >
> > I agree.
> >
> > Mike, how do you think the common clk stuff for s5pv210?
>
> Clock code looks good to me. Which tree do you want to take it through?
Seems like we just missed another kernel release. It's a bit sad that it's
happening so often for Samsung patches...
Best regards,
Tomasz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists