linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] ASoC: fsl_ssi: Add dual fifo mode support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <526FAD41.2000805@tabi.org>
Date:	Tue, 29 Oct 2013 07:42:41 -0500
From:	Timur Tabi <timur@...i.org>
To:	Nicolin Chen <b42378@...escale.com>, shawn.guo@...aro.org,
	broonie@...nel.org
CC:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
	alsa-devel@...a-project.org, rob.herring@...xeda.com,
	mark.rutland@....com, swarren@...dotorg.org, pawel.moll@....com,
	ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk, s.hauer@...gutronix.de,
	b32955@...escale.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ASoC: fsl_ssi: Add dual fifo mode support

Nicolin Chen wrote:
> By enabling dual fifo mode, it would allow SSI enter a better performance
> to transimit/receive data without occasional hardware underrun/overrun.

Have you measured any real performance gain with this patch?  I 
considered adding dual-FIFO support when I originally wrote this driver, 
but it didn't appear to have any real benefit, but it used twice as many 
DMA channels.

I'm concerned that this is another patch that just enables a useless 
feature.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/