[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131029125848.GB5261@spo001.leaseweb.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 13:58:48 +0100
From: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>
To: boris brezillon <b.brezillon@...rkiz.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Fabio Porcedda <fabio.porcedda@...il.com>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
Guenter Roeck <groeck7@...il.com>,
Yang Wenyou <wenyou.yang@...el.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] watchdog: at91sam9_wdt: handle already configured wdt
Hi Boris,
> I'm sorry for the inconvenience, but I found some bugs in my patch series:
>
> 1) the secs_to_ticks returns an erronous value when 0 is passed as an
> argument
> 2) the calculated heartbeat is too small for some use cases
> (i.e. kexecing a new kernel might trigger a watchdog reset before
> the new kernel
> is able to load the watchdog driver)
> 3) when initializing the watchdog driver, the timer should be configured
> with the min_heartbeat value
> instead of the standard heartbeat value, because we don't for how
> long the timer has been running.
>
> I'll send a new patch fixing those issues.
> I hope it won't bother you :-(.
No problem :-). Just sent me the fixes when they are ready.
Kind regards,
Wim.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists