[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-927b54fccbf04207ec92f669dce6806848cbec7d@git.kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 07:07:31 -0700
From: tip-bot for Ben Segall <tipbot@...or.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bsegall@...gle.com, hpa@...or.com,
mingo@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: [tip:sched/core] sched: Fix hrtimer_cancel()/rq->lock deadlock
Commit-ID: 927b54fccbf04207ec92f669dce6806848cbec7d
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/927b54fccbf04207ec92f669dce6806848cbec7d
Author: Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>
AuthorDate: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 11:16:22 -0700
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitDate: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 12:02:21 +0100
sched: Fix hrtimer_cancel()/rq->lock deadlock
__start_cfs_bandwidth calls hrtimer_cancel while holding rq->lock,
waiting for the hrtimer to finish. However, if sched_cfs_period_timer
runs for another loop iteration, the hrtimer can attempt to take
rq->lock, resulting in deadlock.
Fix this by ensuring that cfs_b->timer_active is cleared only if the
_latest_ call to do_sched_cfs_period_timer is returning as idle. Then
__start_cfs_bandwidth can just call hrtimer_try_to_cancel and wait for
that to succeed or timer_active == 1.
Signed-off-by: Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: pjt@...gle.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20131016181622.22647.16643.stgit@sword-of-the-dawn.mtv.corp.google.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 15 +++++++++++----
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 897d977..f6308cb 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -3225,6 +3225,13 @@ static int do_sched_cfs_period_timer(struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b, int overrun)
if (idle)
goto out_unlock;
+ /*
+ * if we have relooped after returning idle once, we need to update our
+ * status as actually running, so that other cpus doing
+ * __start_cfs_bandwidth will stop trying to cancel us.
+ */
+ cfs_b->timer_active = 1;
+
__refill_cfs_bandwidth_runtime(cfs_b);
if (!throttled) {
@@ -3493,11 +3500,11 @@ void __start_cfs_bandwidth(struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b)
* (timer_active==0 becomes visible before the hrtimer call-back
* terminates). In either case we ensure that it's re-programmed
*/
- while (unlikely(hrtimer_active(&cfs_b->period_timer))) {
+ while (unlikely(hrtimer_active(&cfs_b->period_timer)) &&
+ hrtimer_try_to_cancel(&cfs_b->period_timer) < 0) {
+ /* bounce the lock to allow do_sched_cfs_period_timer to run */
raw_spin_unlock(&cfs_b->lock);
- /* ensure cfs_b->lock is available while we wait */
- hrtimer_cancel(&cfs_b->period_timer);
-
+ cpu_relax();
raw_spin_lock(&cfs_b->lock);
/* if someone else restarted the timer then we're done */
if (cfs_b->timer_active)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists