linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] percpu: fix this_cpu_sub() subtrahend casting for unsigneds

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20131029142644.GB1548@cmpxchg.org>
Date:	Tue, 29 Oct 2013 10:26:44 -0400
From:	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
To:	Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>
Cc:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
	Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	handai.szj@...bao.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] percpu: fix this_cpu_sub() subtrahend casting for
 unsigneds

On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 10:30:16AM -0700, Greg Thelen wrote:
> this_cpu_sub() is implemented as negation and addition.
> 
> This patch casts the adjustment to the counter type before negation to
> sign extend the adjustment.  This helps in cases where the counter
> type is wider than an unsigned adjustment.  An alternative to this
> patch is to declare such operations unsupported, but it seemed useful
> to avoid surprises.
> 
> This patch specifically helps the following example:
>   unsigned int delta = 1
>   preempt_disable()
>   this_cpu_write(long_counter, 0)
>   this_cpu_sub(long_counter, delta)
>   preempt_enable()
> 
> Before this change long_counter on a 64 bit machine ends with value
> 0xffffffff, rather than 0xffffffffffffffff.  This is because
> this_cpu_sub(pcp, delta) boils down to this_cpu_add(pcp, -delta),
> which is basically:
>   long_counter = 0 + 0xffffffff
> 
> Also apply the same cast to:
>   __this_cpu_sub()
>   __this_cpu_sub_return()
>   this_cpu_sub_return()
> 
> All percpu_test.ko passes, especially the following cases which
> previously failed:
> 
>   l -= ui_one;
>   __this_cpu_sub(long_counter, ui_one);
>   CHECK(l, long_counter, -1);
> 
>   l -= ui_one;
>   this_cpu_sub(long_counter, ui_one);
>   CHECK(l, long_counter, -1);
>   CHECK(l, long_counter, 0xffffffffffffffff);
> 
>   ul -= ui_one;
>   __this_cpu_sub(ulong_counter, ui_one);
>   CHECK(ul, ulong_counter, -1);
>   CHECK(ul, ulong_counter, 0xffffffffffffffff);
> 
>   ul = this_cpu_sub_return(ulong_counter, ui_one);
>   CHECK(ul, ulong_counter, 2);
> 
>   ul = __this_cpu_sub_return(ulong_counter, ui_one);
>   CHECK(ul, ulong_counter, 1);
> 
> Signed-off-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>
> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>

FWIW:

Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/