linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] genirq: error reporting for non-percpu interrupt in request_percpu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPrCYkdtUjQAC58uhhFQpCXpA=BVQRA=_kcM+WeOht5uk9hfHQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 29 Oct 2013 21:45:00 +0530
From:	Vinayak Kale <vkale@....com>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] genirq: error reporting for non-percpu interrupt in request_percpu_irq()

Hi Thomas,

On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Oct 2013, Vinayak Kale wrote:
>
>> Need for this patch is discussed in mail-thread [1].
>>
>> [1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2013-October/204414.html
>>
>
> I can't see anything which makes use of the separate error code in
> that patch.

It was suggested by Will in response to above mentioned patch.
Will's response can be found here:
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2013-October/204491.html

Sorry for wrong link.

Thanks
-Vinayak
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/