[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1383063845.2713.15.camel@joe-AO722>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 09:24:05 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Markus Pargmann <mpa@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>,
linux-can@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] can: c_can: Speed up rx_poll function
On Tue, 2013-10-29 at 09:58 +0100, Markus Pargmann wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 01:34:48AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Tue, 2013-10-29 at 09:27 +0100, Markus Pargmann wrote:
> > > This patch speeds up the rx_poll function by reducing the number of
> > > register reads.
> > []
> > > 125kbit:
> > > Function Hit Time Avg s^2
> > > -------- --- ---- --- ---
> > > c_can_do_rx_poll 63960 10168178 us 158.977 us 1493056 us
> > > With patch:
> > > c_can_do_rx_poll 63939 4268457 us 66.758 us 818790.9 us
> > >
> > > 1Mbit:
> > > Function Hit Time Avg s^2
> > > -------- --- ---- --- ---
> > > c_can_do_rx_poll 69489 30049498 us 432.435 us 9271851 us
> > > With patch:
> > > c_can_do_rx_poll 103034 24220362 us 235.071 us 6016656 us
[]
> Yes I just measured the timings again:
[]
> ./perf_can_test.sh 125000 30
[]
> c_can_do_rx_poll 63941 3764057 us 58.867 us 776162.2 us
Good, it's slightly faster still.
> ./perf_can_test.sh 1000000 30
[]
> c_can_do_rx_poll 207109 24322185 us 117.436 us 171469047 us
[]
> It is interesting that the number of hits for c_can_do_rx_poll is twice as much
> as it was with find_next_bit.
How is this possible? Any idea?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists