| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAOesGMgKbreaqFTGvC=_T6-i7uejfXAPNU8LmMpgDMqeEwYxZQ@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 10:39:45 -0700 From: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net> To: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...o99.com> Cc: David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>, Bryan Huntsman <bryanh@...eaurora.org>, Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...prootsystems.com>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] ARM: msm: Remove 7x00 support On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Daniel Walker <dwalker@...o99.com> wrote: > Personally I think splitting mach- stuff isn't very useful or > interesting.. There's just no technical reason for it, for example x86 > and x86_64 was a win from my perspective , there's a lot more reason to > keep similar things together than to split things up. There are definitely valid technical reasons for it; the old and new platforms share no code, and the legacy platforms are unlikely to be updated to modern infrastructure anytime soon. Other platforms are managed in similar manners, such as OMAP, imx/mxs, etc. -Olof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists