linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.8 79/81] fs: buffer: move allocation failure loop into the allocator

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1383069882-11437-80-git-send-email-kamal@canonical.com>
Date:	Tue, 29 Oct 2013 11:04:40 -0700
From:	Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc:	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.8 79/81] fs: buffer: move allocation failure loop into the allocator

3.8.13.12 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>

commit 84235de394d9775bfaa7fa9762a59d91fef0c1fc upstream.

Buffer allocation has a very crude indefinite loop around waking the
flusher threads and performing global NOFS direct reclaim because it can
not handle allocation failures.

The most immediate problem with this is that the allocation may fail due
to a memory cgroup limit, where flushers + direct reclaim might not make
any progress towards resolving the situation at all.  Because unlike the
global case, a memory cgroup may not have any cache at all, only
anonymous pages but no swap.  This situation will lead to a reclaim
livelock with insane IO from waking the flushers and thrashing unrelated
filesystem cache in a tight loop.

Use __GFP_NOFAIL allocations for buffers for now.  This makes sure that
any looping happens in the page allocator, which knows how to
orchestrate kswapd, direct reclaim, and the flushers sensibly.  It also
allows memory cgroups to detect allocations that can't handle failure
and will allow them to ultimately bypass the limit if reclaim can not
make progress.

Reported-by: azurIt <azurit@...ox.sk>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
---
 fs/buffer.c     | 14 ++++++++++++--
 mm/memcontrol.c |  2 ++
 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/buffer.c b/fs/buffer.c
index 7a75c3e..be83882 100644
--- a/fs/buffer.c
+++ b/fs/buffer.c
@@ -965,9 +965,19 @@ grow_dev_page(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block,
 	struct buffer_head *bh;
 	sector_t end_block;
 	int ret = 0;		/* Will call free_more_memory() */
+	gfp_t gfp_mask;

-	page = find_or_create_page(inode->i_mapping, index,
-		(mapping_gfp_mask(inode->i_mapping) & ~__GFP_FS)|__GFP_MOVABLE);
+	gfp_mask = mapping_gfp_mask(inode->i_mapping) & ~__GFP_FS;
+	gfp_mask |= __GFP_MOVABLE;
+	/*
+	 * XXX: __getblk_slow() can not really deal with failure and
+	 * will endlessly loop on improvised global reclaim.  Prefer
+	 * looping in the allocator rather than here, at least that
+	 * code knows what it's doing.
+	 */
+	gfp_mask |= __GFP_NOFAIL;
+
+	page = find_or_create_page(inode->i_mapping, index, gfp_mask);
 	if (!page)
 		return ret;

diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 6b7ff19..b150e66f 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -2614,6 +2614,8 @@ done:
 	return 0;
 nomem:
 	*ptr = NULL;
+	if (gfp_mask & __GFP_NOFAIL)
+		return 0;
 	return -ENOMEM;
 bypass:
 	*ptr = root_mem_cgroup;
-- 
1.8.1.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/