[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131029190358.GB13047@fifo99.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 12:03:58 -0700
From: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...o99.com>
To: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Cc: David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>,
Bryan Huntsman <bryanh@...eaurora.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...prootsystems.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] ARM: msm: Remove 7x00 support
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 10:39:45AM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Daniel Walker <dwalker@...o99.com> wrote:
>
> > Personally I think splitting mach- stuff isn't very useful or
> > interesting.. There's just no technical reason for it, for example x86
> > and x86_64 was a win from my perspective , there's a lot more reason to
> > keep similar things together than to split things up.
>
> There are definitely valid technical reasons for it; the old and new
> platforms share no code, and the legacy platforms are unlikely to be
> updated to modern infrastructure anytime soon. Other platforms are
> managed in similar manners, such as OMAP, imx/mxs, etc.
Are you speaking from a meta perspective , or you have specific example
in msm code ?
Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists