[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131029202439.4740b297@skate>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 20:24:39 +0100
From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@...e-electrons.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
sachin.kamat@...aro.org, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
dmaengine@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] dma: mv_xor: Use high_base mmio where appropriate
Dear Dan Williams,
On Tue, 29 Oct 2013 12:15:18 -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> > I agree with Ezequiel, and I believe his patch is appropriate. The
> > registers for the XOR engines are indeed split in two areas, so it
> > makes sense to have this xor_base / xor_high_base split that reflects
> > the register mapping passed from the Device Tree, and use this split in
> > the macros used to access the registers.
> >
>
> Ah ok, so it's a bug if an implementation ever puts the second
> resource window at a non 0x200 offset.
Exactly.
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists