[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131029195920.GA4538@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 20:59:20 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: David Long <dave.long@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Rabin Vincent <rabin@....in>,
"Jon Medhurst (Tixy)" <tixy@...aro.org>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/13] uprobes: add arch write opcode hook
On 10/28, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> Yes, yes, sorry for confusion. What I actually tried to suggest is
> something like the trivial patch below.
>
> Then arm can do:
>
> uprobe_opcode_t arch_uprobe_swbp_insn(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe)
> {
> return __opcode_to_mem_arm(auprobe->bpinsn);
> }
>
> No?
>
> > I notice there don't seem to be any alternative set_swbp functions
> > in the (rc6) kernel tree
>
> Yes... I think we should simply make it "static". And set_orig_insn()
> too.
Or. arm can actually reimplement set_swbp(). This doesn't mean the
duplication of write_opcode() code, we can simply export this helper.
Either way is imho better than this patch. Unless I missed something.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists