[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131029220939.GA23060@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 15:09:39 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: ebiederm@...ssion.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] sysfs: move assignment to be under lock in sysfs_remove_dir()
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Linus noticed that the assignment of sd isn't protected by the lock in
sysfs_remove_dir(), so move the assignment of the variable under the
lock to be safe.
Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
Tejun, any objection to this patch? You consolidated the locks back in
2007 on this function, and nothing has changed there since then, so odds
are it's not a problem, but nice to be safe, right?
fs/sysfs/dir.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/sysfs/dir.c b/fs/sysfs/dir.c
index eab59de4..2609f934 100644
--- a/fs/sysfs/dir.c
+++ b/fs/sysfs/dir.c
@@ -856,9 +856,10 @@ void sysfs_remove(struct sysfs_dirent *sd)
*/
void sysfs_remove_dir(struct kobject *kobj)
{
- struct sysfs_dirent *sd = kobj->sd;
+ struct sysfs_dirent *sd;
spin_lock(&sysfs_assoc_lock);
+ sd = kobj->sd;
kobj->sd = NULL;
spin_unlock(&sysfs_assoc_lock);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists