| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 22:06:45 -0700 From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org> To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com> Cc: "linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] edac: Document Krait L1/L2 EDAC driver binding On 10/28, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 12:31:28AM +0000, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > + > > +Optional properties: > > +- interrupt-names: Should contain the interrupt names "l1_irq" and > > + "l2_irq" > > As with my comment on the parsing code, I'd prefer that if interrupt-names was > present it defined the order of interrupts. Otherwise it's redundant and of no > value. > > Otherwise, the binding looks fine to me: > > Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com> How about I just drop the interrupt-names property? It isn't adding much and is a holdover from the vendor kernel. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists