| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 17:40:25 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>,
Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the tip tree
Hi Andrew,
Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in
arch/x86/mm/init.c between commit 6979287a7df6 ("x86/mm: Add 'step_size'
comments to init_mem_mapping()") from the tip tree and commits
6452c268c6d6 ("x86/mm: factor out of top-down direct mapping setup") and
f790250c098a ("x86/mem-hotplug: support initialize page tables in
bottom-up") from the akpm-current tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
is required).
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
diff --cc arch/x86/mm/init.c
index ce32017c5e38,b6892a71cbfc..000000000000
--- a/arch/x86/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/init.c
@@@ -399,28 -399,23 +399,39 @@@ static unsigned long __init init_range_
return mapped_ram_size;
}
-/* (PUD_SHIFT-PMD_SHIFT)/2 */
-#define STEP_SIZE_SHIFT 5
+static unsigned long __init get_new_step_size(unsigned long step_size)
+{
+ /*
+ * Explain why we shift by 5 and why we don't have to worry about
+ * 'step_size << 5' overflowing:
+ *
+ * initial mapped size is PMD_SIZE (2M).
+ * We can not set step_size to be PUD_SIZE (1G) yet.
+ * In worse case, when we cross the 1G boundary, and
+ * PG_LEVEL_2M is not set, we will need 1+1+512 pages (2M + 8k)
+ * to map 1G range with PTE. Use 5 as shift for now.
+ *
+ * Don't need to worry about overflow, on 32bit, when step_size
+ * is 0, round_down() returns 0 for start, and that turns it
+ * into 0x100000000ULL.
+ */
+ return step_size << 5;
+}
- void __init init_mem_mapping(void)
+ /**
+ * memory_map_top_down - Map [map_start, map_end) top down
+ * @map_start: start address of the target memory range
+ * @map_end: end address of the target memory range
+ *
+ * This function will setup direct mapping for memory range
+ * [map_start, map_end) in top-down. That said, the page tables
+ * will be allocated at the end of the memory, and we map the
+ * memory in top-down.
+ */
+ static void __init memory_map_top_down(unsigned long map_start,
+ unsigned long map_end)
{
- unsigned long end, real_end, start, last_start;
+ unsigned long real_end, start, last_start;
unsigned long step_size;
unsigned long addr;
unsigned long mapped_ram_size = 0;
@@@ -470,8 -454,89 +470,89 @@@
mapped_ram_size += new_mapped_ram_size;
}
- if (real_end < end)
- init_range_memory_mapping(real_end, end);
+ if (real_end < map_end)
+ init_range_memory_mapping(real_end, map_end);
+ }
+
+ /**
+ * memory_map_bottom_up - Map [map_start, map_end) bottom up
+ * @map_start: start address of the target memory range
+ * @map_end: end address of the target memory range
+ *
+ * This function will setup direct mapping for memory range
+ * [map_start, map_end) in bottom-up. Since we have limited the
+ * bottom-up allocation above the kernel, the page tables will
+ * be allocated just above the kernel and we map the memory
+ * in [map_start, map_end) in bottom-up.
+ */
+ static void __init memory_map_bottom_up(unsigned long map_start,
+ unsigned long map_end)
+ {
+ unsigned long next, new_mapped_ram_size, start;
+ unsigned long mapped_ram_size = 0;
+ /* step_size need to be small so pgt_buf from BRK could cover it */
+ unsigned long step_size = PMD_SIZE;
+
+ start = map_start;
+ min_pfn_mapped = start >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+
+ /*
+ * We start from the bottom (@map_start) and go to the top (@map_end).
+ * The memblock_find_in_range() gets us a block of RAM from the
+ * end of RAM in [min_pfn_mapped, max_pfn_mapped) used as new pages
+ * for page table.
+ */
+ while (start < map_end) {
+ if (map_end - start > step_size) {
+ next = round_up(start + 1, step_size);
+ if (next > map_end)
+ next = map_end;
+ } else
+ next = map_end;
+
+ new_mapped_ram_size = init_range_memory_mapping(start, next);
+ start = next;
+
+ if (new_mapped_ram_size > mapped_ram_size)
- step_size <<= STEP_SIZE_SHIFT;
++ step_size = get_new_step_size(step_size);
+ mapped_ram_size += new_mapped_ram_size;
+ }
+ }
+
+ void __init init_mem_mapping(void)
+ {
+ unsigned long end;
+
+ probe_page_size_mask();
+
+ #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
+ end = max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
+ #else
+ end = max_low_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
+ #endif
+
+ /* the ISA range is always mapped regardless of memory holes */
+ init_memory_mapping(0, ISA_END_ADDRESS);
+
+ /*
+ * If the allocation is in bottom-up direction, we setup direct mapping
+ * in bottom-up, otherwise we setup direct mapping in top-down.
+ */
+ if (memblock_bottom_up()) {
+ unsigned long kernel_end = __pa_symbol(_end);
+
+ /*
+ * we need two separate calls here. This is because we want to
+ * allocate page tables above the kernel. So we first map
+ * [kernel_end, end) to make memory above the kernel be mapped
+ * as soon as possible. And then use page tables allocated above
+ * the kernel to map [ISA_END_ADDRESS, kernel_end).
+ */
+ memory_map_bottom_up(kernel_end, end);
+ memory_map_bottom_up(ISA_END_ADDRESS, kernel_end);
+ } else {
+ memory_map_top_down(ISA_END_ADDRESS, end);
+ }
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
if (max_pfn > max_low_pfn) {
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists