[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131030003436.GB3268@kartoffel>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 17:34:36 -0700
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Cc: "linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] edac: Document Krait L1/L2 EDAC driver binding
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 05:06:45AM +0000, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 10/28, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 12:31:28AM +0000, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > > +
> > > +Optional properties:
> > > +- interrupt-names: Should contain the interrupt names "l1_irq" and
> > > + "l2_irq"
> >
> > As with my comment on the parsing code, I'd prefer that if interrupt-names was
> > present it defined the order of interrupts. Otherwise it's redundant and of no
> > value.
> >
> > Otherwise, the binding looks fine to me:
> >
> > Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
>
> How about I just drop the interrupt-names property? It isn't
> adding much and is a holdover from the vendor kernel.
That's also fine given that this is a very specific binding.
Mark.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists