| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <201310302214.ABE87589.JtSOFFLQFHMOOV@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 22:14:10 +0900
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To: stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 3.11-stable] mutex: Avoid gcc version dependent __builtin_constant_p() usage
Commit b0267507dfd0187fb7840a0ec461a510a7f041c5 upstream.
Commit 040a0a37 ("mutex: Add support for wound/wait style locks")
used "!__builtin_constant_p(p == NULL)" but gcc 3.x cannot
handle such expression correctly, leading to boot failure when
built with CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES=y.
Fix it by explicitly passing a bool which tells whether p != NULL
or not.
[ PeterZ: This is a sad patch, but provided it actually generates
similar code I suppose its the best we can do bar whole
sale deprecating gcc-3. ]
Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Acked-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...onical.com>
Cc: peterz@...radead.org
Cc: imirkin@...m.mit.edu
Cc: daniel.vetter@...ll.ch
Cc: robdclark@...il.com
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/201310171945.AGB17114.FSQVtHOJFOOFML@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
kernel/mutex.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++----------------
1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
--- linux-3.11.6.orig/kernel/mutex.c
+++ linux-3.11.6/kernel/mutex.c
@@ -408,7 +408,7 @@ ww_mutex_set_context_fastpath(struct ww_
static __always_inline int __sched
__mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, long state, unsigned int subclass,
struct lockdep_map *nest_lock, unsigned long ip,
- struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx)
+ struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx, const bool use_ww_ctx)
{
struct task_struct *task = current;
struct mutex_waiter waiter;
@@ -448,7 +448,7 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock,
struct task_struct *owner;
struct mspin_node node;
- if (!__builtin_constant_p(ww_ctx == NULL) && ww_ctx->acquired > 0) {
+ if (use_ww_ctx && ww_ctx->acquired > 0) {
struct ww_mutex *ww;
ww = container_of(lock, struct ww_mutex, base);
@@ -478,7 +478,7 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock,
if ((atomic_read(&lock->count) == 1) &&
(atomic_cmpxchg(&lock->count, 1, 0) == 1)) {
lock_acquired(&lock->dep_map, ip);
- if (!__builtin_constant_p(ww_ctx == NULL)) {
+ if (use_ww_ctx) {
struct ww_mutex *ww;
ww = container_of(lock, struct ww_mutex, base);
@@ -548,7 +548,7 @@ slowpath:
goto err;
}
- if (!__builtin_constant_p(ww_ctx == NULL) && ww_ctx->acquired > 0) {
+ if (use_ww_ctx && ww_ctx->acquired > 0) {
ret = __mutex_lock_check_stamp(lock, ww_ctx);
if (ret)
goto err;
@@ -568,7 +568,7 @@ done:
mutex_remove_waiter(lock, &waiter, current_thread_info());
mutex_set_owner(lock);
- if (!__builtin_constant_p(ww_ctx == NULL)) {
+ if (use_ww_ctx) {
struct ww_mutex *ww = container_of(lock,
struct ww_mutex,
base);
@@ -618,7 +618,7 @@ mutex_lock_nested(struct mutex *lock, un
{
might_sleep();
__mutex_lock_common(lock, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE,
- subclass, NULL, _RET_IP_, NULL);
+ subclass, NULL, _RET_IP_, NULL, 0);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mutex_lock_nested);
@@ -628,7 +628,7 @@ _mutex_lock_nest_lock(struct mutex *lock
{
might_sleep();
__mutex_lock_common(lock, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE,
- 0, nest, _RET_IP_, NULL);
+ 0, nest, _RET_IP_, NULL, 0);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(_mutex_lock_nest_lock);
@@ -638,7 +638,7 @@ mutex_lock_killable_nested(struct mutex
{
might_sleep();
return __mutex_lock_common(lock, TASK_KILLABLE,
- subclass, NULL, _RET_IP_, NULL);
+ subclass, NULL, _RET_IP_, NULL, 0);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mutex_lock_killable_nested);
@@ -647,7 +647,7 @@ mutex_lock_interruptible_nested(struct m
{
might_sleep();
return __mutex_lock_common(lock, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE,
- subclass, NULL, _RET_IP_, NULL);
+ subclass, NULL, _RET_IP_, NULL, 0);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mutex_lock_interruptible_nested);
@@ -685,7 +685,7 @@ __ww_mutex_lock(struct ww_mutex *lock, s
might_sleep();
ret = __mutex_lock_common(&lock->base, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE,
- 0, &ctx->dep_map, _RET_IP_, ctx);
+ 0, &ctx->dep_map, _RET_IP_, ctx, 1);
if (!ret && ctx->acquired > 1)
return ww_mutex_deadlock_injection(lock, ctx);
@@ -700,7 +700,7 @@ __ww_mutex_lock_interruptible(struct ww_
might_sleep();
ret = __mutex_lock_common(&lock->base, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE,
- 0, &ctx->dep_map, _RET_IP_, ctx);
+ 0, &ctx->dep_map, _RET_IP_, ctx, 1);
if (!ret && ctx->acquired > 1)
return ww_mutex_deadlock_injection(lock, ctx);
@@ -812,28 +812,28 @@ __mutex_lock_slowpath(atomic_t *lock_cou
struct mutex *lock = container_of(lock_count, struct mutex, count);
__mutex_lock_common(lock, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE, 0,
- NULL, _RET_IP_, NULL);
+ NULL, _RET_IP_, NULL, 0);
}
static noinline int __sched
__mutex_lock_killable_slowpath(struct mutex *lock)
{
return __mutex_lock_common(lock, TASK_KILLABLE, 0,
- NULL, _RET_IP_, NULL);
+ NULL, _RET_IP_, NULL, 0);
}
static noinline int __sched
__mutex_lock_interruptible_slowpath(struct mutex *lock)
{
return __mutex_lock_common(lock, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, 0,
- NULL, _RET_IP_, NULL);
+ NULL, _RET_IP_, NULL, 0);
}
static noinline int __sched
__ww_mutex_lock_slowpath(struct ww_mutex *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx)
{
return __mutex_lock_common(&lock->base, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE, 0,
- NULL, _RET_IP_, ctx);
+ NULL, _RET_IP_, ctx, 1);
}
static noinline int __sched
@@ -841,7 +841,7 @@ __ww_mutex_lock_interruptible_slowpath(s
struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx)
{
return __mutex_lock_common(&lock->base, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, 0,
- NULL, _RET_IP_, ctx);
+ NULL, _RET_IP_, ctx, 1);
}
#endif
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists