[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20131030135307.D8CE1C402A0@trevor.secretlab.ca>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 06:53:07 -0700
From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
'Beno?t Cousson' <bcousson@...libre.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 1/3] Input: twl4030-keypad - add device tree support
On Sun, 27 Oct 2013 12:47:53 +0100, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> wrote:
> > > > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF)
> > > I'm probably missing something here, but why not #ifdef CONFIG_OF?
> >
> > I have been told for other drivers, that IS_ENABLED() is
> > the prefered way to check for configuration these days.
>
> CONFIG_OF can not be module, using IS_ENABLED() on it is just wrong.
That makes no sense. There is absolutely nothing wrong with using
IS_ENABLED() for CONFIG_OF.
g.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists