[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131030143527.GB8193@console-pimps.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 14:35:27 +0000
From: Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>
To: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@....com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-efi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
"matt.fleming@...el.com" <matt.fleming@...el.com>,
"tony.luck@...el.com" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Tomoki Sekiyama <tomoki.sekiyama@....com>,
"dle-develop@...ts.sourceforge.net"
<dle-develop@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] efivars,efi-pstore: Hold off deletion of sysfs entry
until, the scan is completed
On Fri, 18 Oct, at 10:30:58PM, Seiji Aguchi wrote:
> The scanning and deleting logic is still needed. In case an entry(A)
> is found, the pointer is saved to psi->data. And efi_pstore_read()
> passes the entry(A) to a pstore filesystem by releasing
> __efivars->lock.
>
> And then, the pstore filesystem calls efi_pstore_read() again and the
> same entry(A), which is saved to psi->data, is used for re-scanning a
> sysfs-list. (That is why list_for_each_entry_safe_from () is used in
> efi_pstore_sysfs_entry_iter().)
>
> So, to protect the entry(A), the logic is needed because, in pstore
> filesystem, __efivars->lock Is released.
Very good point.
--
Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists