[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131030154443.GJ4651@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 17:44:43 +0200
From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
aik@...abs.ru, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] kvm: Destroy & free KVM devices on release
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 04:42:15PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 30/10/2013 16:33, Gleb Natapov ha scritto:
> > > Hmm, ok. In that case I can drop this patch and I think the rest just
> > > boils down to userspace use of the device. I had been close()'ing the
> > > kvm device fd when all QEMU vfio devices are detached, but I can just as
> > > easily leave it open in case a new device is added later. I'll send out
> > > a new series after doing some more review and testing. Do you have any
> > > comments on the rest of the series? Thanks,
> >
> > If I understand 4/4 correctly if there is VFIO device connected we
> > assume non coherent domain. How hard it would be to do proper checking
> > in this path series?
>
> Yes, that's my understanding as well. Is the performance impact measurable?
>
We grant a guest permission to call wbinvd() needlessly.
--
Gleb.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists