linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] kvm: Destroy & free KVM devices on release

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 30 Oct 2013 17:44:43 +0200
From:	Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>
To:	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc:	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	aik@...abs.ru, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] kvm: Destroy & free KVM devices on release

On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 04:42:15PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 30/10/2013 16:33, Gleb Natapov ha scritto:
> > > Hmm, ok.  In that case I can drop this patch and I think the rest just
> > > boils down to userspace use of the device.  I had been close()'ing the
> > > kvm device fd when all QEMU vfio devices are detached, but I can just as
> > > easily leave it open in case a new device is added later.  I'll send out
> > > a new series after doing some more review and testing.  Do you have any
> > > comments on the rest of the series?  Thanks,
> >
> > If I understand 4/4 correctly if there is VFIO device connected we
> > assume non coherent domain. How hard it would be to do proper checking
> > in this path series?
> 
> Yes, that's my understanding as well.  Is the performance impact measurable?
> 
We grant a guest permission to call wbinvd() needlessly.

--
			Gleb.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/