[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5271333F.9040500@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 09:26:39 -0700
From: David Cohen <david.a.cohen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
CC: balbi@...com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH v2 1/3] usb: gadget: add quirks field to struct usb_gadget
>> diff --git a/include/linux/usb/gadget.h b/include/linux/usb/gadget.h
>> index 942ef5e..7014ad9 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/usb/gadget.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/usb/gadget.h
>> @@ -540,6 +540,11 @@ struct usb_gadget {
>> struct device dev;
>> unsigned out_epnum;
>> unsigned in_epnum;
>> +
>> + u32 quirks;
>> +/* epout requires buffer size to be aligned to MaxPacketSize */
>> +#define USB_GADGET_QUIRK_EP_OUT_ALIGNED_SIZE (1 << 0)
>
> If you decide to go through with this, it might be better to define a
> series of single-bit flags instead of a single "quirks" field. For
> example:
>
> unsigned quirk_ep_out_aligned_size:1;
>
> Yes, other people (including me!) have done it your way in the past,
> but now this seems to make more sense.
It would be less error-prone. I'll change it.
Thanks,
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists